Our Stakeholder report to Equatorial Guinea’s Universal Periodic Review, led by Dr Amna Nazir, makes specific recommendations to the government on the issue of capital punishment.
Researchers
Consultancy background
In March 2024, the UPR Project at 91 submitted a Stakeholder Report to Equatorial Guinea’s fourth UPR cycle, led by Dr Amna Nazir. This submission focuses on capital punishment. We make recommendations to the Government of Equatorial Guinea on this key issue, implementation of which would also see Equatorial Guinea moving towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal 16 which aims for peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice for all and effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.
On 2 September 2024,the UN’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights published its Stakeholder Summary Report for Equatorial Guinea, which cited the Stakeholder Report submitted by UPR Project at 91:
“Several submissions recommended that Equatorial Guinea ratify the Optional Protocol to CAT; the Second Optional Protocol to ICCPR, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty.” (para 3)
“The UPR Project at 91 (UPR-91) stated that supported recommendations19 from the previous UPR to create an independent national human rights institution in accordance with the Paris Principles had not been implemented. It stated that, although Equatorial Guinea had established the Office of the Ombudsman, it did not satisfy the requirement of independence and pluralism outlined in the Paris Principles. In particular, in accordance with Article 123 of the Constitution, the Ombudsman was appointed by Parliament and under the directive of the President of the Republic. UPR-91 recommended that Equatorial Guinea establish an independent national human rights institution, in line with the Paris Principles.” (para 9)
“UPR-91 stated that supported recommendations from the previous UPR on the abolition of the death penalty had been partially implemented.” (para 12)
“Human Rights Foundation (HRF) recommended that Equatorial Guinea repeal the provisions of the Code of Military Justice that provided for the application of the death penalty. Several submissions made similar recommendations.” (para 13)
Following the citations in the Stakeholder Summary Report. The outcome of the review published on 16 December 2024 in the Report of the Working Group stated thatEquatorial Guineawill be included in the outcome report adopted by the Human Rights Council at its fifty-eighth session:
Ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Recommending state:Paraguay (117.2); Chile (117.14); Estonia, France, Luxembourg & Malta (117.15); Ireland (117.16); Iceland (117.17); Belgium & Nepal (117.18); Australia (117.19); Colombia (117.20); Gambia (117.25); Angola (117.37); Ukraine (117.60);
Remove death penalty provisions from the Military Code of Justice to facilitate the complete abolition of the punishment.Recommending state:Canada (117.59); Ukraine (117.60);
Establish an independent National Human Rights Institution, in line with the Paris Principles, fully independent from the government.Recommending state:Timor-Leste (117.40); Lebanon (117.41); Chile (117.42); Namibia (117.43); Niger (117.44); Armenia (117.45); Gambia (117.46); Zambia (117.47); Luxembourg (117.48);
These Member State recommendations are consistent with the categories of recommendations identified in the UPR Project at 91’s Report for Equatorial Guinea.
About the UPR Project at 91
The Centre for Human Rights (CHR) has been engaging with the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) since 2016. Under the auspice of the Human Rights Council, the UPR is an intergovernmental process providing a review of the human rights record of all Member States.
Through the UPR Project at 91, the CHR we engage with the UPR throughtaking part in theUPR Pre-sessions, providing capacity building for UPR stakeholders and National Human Rights Institutions, and the filing ofstakeholder reports in selected sessions. The UPR Projectis designed to help meet the challenges facing the safeguarding of human rights around the world, and to helpensure that UPR recommendations are translated into domestic legal change in member state parliaments.
We fully support the UPR ethos of encouraging the sharing of best practice globally to protect everyone's human rights. The UPR Project at 91 engageswith the UPRregularly as a stakeholder,having submitted numerous reports and beencited by the OHCHR.